Class worked on studying the concept of Federalism, including doing a "pop-quiz" and then analyzing the responses students had.
Students in periods 5 and 6 also read the article below and then wrote a paragraph describing what Senator Sanders believes the problem to be. Students were to write a second paragraph brainstorming solutions to the problem.
On Friday periods 5 and 6 extended their study of the essay by learning more about GOTV activities. Students studied the science of GOTV via a jigsaw and are currently in groups planning a GOTV campaign.
Students in periods 5 and 6 also read the article below and then wrote a paragraph describing what Senator Sanders believes the problem to be. Students were to write a second paragraph brainstorming solutions to the problem.
On Friday periods 5 and 6 extended their study of the essay by learning more about GOTV activities. Students studied the science of GOTV via a jigsaw and are currently in groups planning a GOTV campaign.
The United States ranks 120th in the world for average national
turnout, right behind Yemen and Estonia. Photograph: Ted S Warren/AP
Monday
10 November 2014 07.45 EST
Americans should be embarrassed. The low voter turnout on Election Day last
week in the United States was an international disgrace.
What has become of a democratic form
of government that Abraham Lincoln said was “of the people, by the people, for the people”? Can we be satisfied with a “democracy” when more than 60% of people don’t vote and
some 80% of young people and low-income Americans don’t either? Can we be
content when poll after poll shows that most Americans can’t even name the political parties that control the US Senate and
House – or who their member of Congress is?
Nationwide, preliminary indications show that the total turnout in the US midterms
was only 36.6%. If these estimates hold true, 2014
will be the least representative election in modern American history. When
billionaires and corporations tilt elections, conservatives suppress voting and
crucial voters feel unengaged, what kind of example for the world is that?
Americans do better when the
presidency is at stake, but a post-World Word II turnout ranging from 52% to 64% is
nothing to brag about. The International Institute for Democracy and Electoral
Assistance ranks the United States 120th in the world for average national turnout. In Scotland, for example, 84.6% voted on the independence referendum.
In Denmark, 80% of the population at the polls is
the norm. In Australia, where voting is compulsory, turnout
is even higher.
When Congress returns here this week,
I will introduce legislation to
make Election Day a national holiday – call it Democracy Day – so that everyone
has the time and opportunity to vote. This would by no means be a cure-all for
increasing turnout, but it would mark one important step to increase
participation and create the kind of political system that the world can look
upon as an example, not a failure.
To keep the super-rich from turning
our democracy into an oligarchy, we must also focus on campaign finance. With dark money and TV ads playing such an important role in
contemporary politics, how many candidates can run
successful campaigns representing the interests of the struggling working
families of our country? If people do not see candidates fighting for their interests, why will they vote at all?
We need a constitutional amendment to
overturn the disastrous 2010 US supreme court ruling in Citizens United that
let a corporate class spend unlimited sums. We also need public funding of
elections so that candidates who are not rich or dependent upon the rich can
actually win.
Meanwhile, instead of encouraging
more people to take part in our democracy, Republican state legislatures and
governors have aggressively passed laws to keep people away from the polls,
especially low-income and young people. They have made it harder to register to vote.
They have reduced opportunities for early voting.
And they have made it more difficult to vote on Election Day by requiring picture IDs – supposedly to address all-but-non-existent voter fraud.
But voter-ID laws aren’t intended to
discourage fraud – they are intended to discourage voting, and they have
worked. A study I requested from the Government Accountability Office, a non-partisan congressional watchdog, found that states with strict
voter-ID laws saw turnouts drop 2-3% compared to states without them. These
disenfranchising laws are designed by people afraid of what would happen to
them if more people were involved in the political process. What cowards!
For those of us who believe in a
vibrant democracy with an engaged and well-informed electorate, we have a lot
of work ahead. Sadly, in the year 2014, we must still convince the American
people about the relevance of government to their lives.
We must convince young people that if
they vote in large numbers, we can lower the 20% real unemployment they are
experiencing with a major jobs program. We must convince students that if they
participate in the political process, we can lower the outrageously high
student debt they face. We must convince low-income workers that voting can
raise the national minimum wage to a real living wage. We must convince seniors
that not only can we prevent cuts to Social Security – we can expand the paltry
benefits that so many are forced to live on. We must convince the millions of
Americans who are deeply worried about climate change that political
participation can transform our energy system away from fossil fuels to energy
efficiency and sustainable energy – and create millions of jobs.
Throughout American history, people
have fought and died to protect our democracy and set an example for other
nations. In these very difficult times, we cannot turn our backs on turnout. We
should celebrate it.
No comments:
Post a Comment